Section 801 - Congressional review

5 Citing briefs

  1. Cooper v. Navient Solutions, Llc

    MOTION for partial summary judgment

    Filed March 23, 2017

    The Commission will send a copy of the Order, including this FRFA, in a report to be sent to Congress and the Government Accountability Office pursuant to the Congressional Review Act.69 In addition, the Commission will send a copy of the Order, including this FRFA, to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration. A copy of the Order (or summaries thereof) will also be published in the Federal Register.70 69 5 U.S.C. § 801(a)(1)(A). 70 See id.

  2. Cic Services, Llc et al v. Internal Revenue Service et al

    MOTION to Dismiss

    Filed May 30, 2017

    Count II contends that the Notices are arbitrary and capricious under the APA because it was allegedly irrational for the IRS to require disclosures from advisors or participants in potentially abusive captive insurance transactions. Count III contends that that the Notices are procedurally invalid because the IRS allegedly failed to submit them to Congress and the Comptroller General in accordance with the Congressional Review Act (“CRA”), 5 U.S.C. §§ 801 et seq. Count IV requests a declaration under the Declaratory Judgment Act (“DJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2201, that the Notices are invalid because they were not the product of notice-and-comment rulemaking.

  3. Associated Builders and Contractors of Texas, Inc. et al v. National Labor Relations Board

    REPLY to Response to Motion

    Filed March 20, 2015

    1714. 8 As noted above, Congress has quite recently reaffirmed its intent to preserve the balanced election process that was in place prior to the new Rule by voting with substantial majorities in both houses to disapprove the new NLRB rule under the Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801. See S.J. Res.

  4. State of Nevada et al v. United States Department of Labor et al

    RESPONSE in Opposition re Emergency MOTION for Preliminary Injunction and Request for Oral Argument and Expedited Consideration

    Filed October 31, 2016

    ................................. 42, 44, 46 Weinberger v. Romero-Barcelo, 456 U.S. 305 (1982) .......................................................................................................... 46 West. v. Anne Arundel Cty., Md., 137 F.3d 752 (4th Cir. 1998) ............................................................................................ 19 Whitman v. American Trucking Assoc., 531 U.S. 457 (2001) .................................................................................................... 40, 41 Winter v. NRDC, 555 U.S. 7 (2008) .............................................................................................................. 16 Wirtz v. Mississippi Publishers Corp., 364 F.2d 603 (5th Cir. 1966) .......................................................................... 23, 26, 31, 34 STATUTES 5 U.S.C. § 553 ......................................................................................................................... 15, 35 5 U.S.C. § 801 ............................................................................................................................... 16 29 U.S.C. § 202 ............................................................................................................................. 41 29 U.S.C. § 203 ............................................................................................................................. 21 29 U.S.C. § 206 ......................................................................................................................... 2, 34 29 U.S.C. § 207 ............................................................................................................................... 2 29 U.S.C. § 213 ...................................................................................................................... passim REGULATIONS 29 C.F.R. part 541 ............................................................................................................

  5. Public Citizen, Inc. et al v. Mukasey

    MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings or in the alternative, MOTION for Summary Judgment

    Filed August 12, 2008

    However, rules designated by OMB as “major” under the Congressional Review Act of 1996 (Pub. L. No. 104- 121, 5 U.S.C. § 801 et seq.) may not be made effective until at least 60 days after publication or 60 days after Congress receives notification of the rule as required by the Act, whichever is later. Schedule for NMVTIS Rule Requiring Reporting by Insurance Carriers, and Junk and Salvage Yards 16.