Plaintiff provided the U.S. Marshal with a deposit of USD 5,000 for its fees and expenses in connection with serving the process of maritime attachment and garnishment upon the vessel and no further deposit has been requested by the U.S. Marshal. Accordingly, SHINE’s reliance upon L.R. 521 and 28 U.S.C. § 1921 is inapplicable. B. The District Court has the Authority to Designate Custodia Legis Expenses Custodia legis expenses are defined as expenses incurred “when a vessel is in the custody of the law, having been seized by the Marshal.”

28 C.F.R. § 0.114(a)(3), amended by 78 Fed.Reg. 59,817, 59,819 (Sept. 30, 2013); see also 28 U.S.C. § 1921(a)(1); http://www.gsa.gov/mileage. DeBose used a local company, ATA Process, LLC (“ATA”), to serve process and/or serve subpoenas.

This Honorable Court should similarly exercise its discretion and order Plaintiff to post adequate security for Camela's costs. Moreover, in the instant matter, the costs and expenses listed are specifically covered by 28 U.S.C. §1921(a)(l)(E) and must be taxed as costs of court. See Marastro Compania Naviera S.A. v. Canadian Maritime Carriers, Ltd. 959 F2d 49, 53 (5th Cir 1992); see also Zak Marine Company, Ltd. v. Exportkhleb of Moscow, et al., 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9953 (E.D.La. 1993).