C. Consequently, Quick has every incentive to maximize the Class’s recovery. III. THE COURT SHOULD APPROVE QUICK’S SELECTION OF LEAD COUNSEL Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 78u-4(a)(3)(B)(v), the Lead Plaintiff is entitled to select and retain Lead Counsel for the Class, subject to the Court’s approval. Quick has selected the Faruqi Firm to be Lead Counsel for the Class.

Case 3:11-cv-02098-O Document 15 Filed 10/24/11 Page 16 of 19 PageID 94 12 plaintiff‟s choice of counsel unless necessary to “protect the interests of the class.” 15 U.S.C. §78u-4(a)(3)(B)(iii)(II)(aa). The Revalong Fund has selected the Faruqi Firm to be Lead Counsel.

The Court should not disturb lead plaintiff’s choice of counsel unless it is necessary to “protect the interests of the class.” 15 U.S.C. § 78u-4(a)(3)(B)(iii)(II)(aa). Because Steinborn-Pilewski have selected and retained counsel experienced in litigating securities fraud class actions with the resources required to prosecute this action to the greatest recovery possible for the class, they respectfully ask the Court to approve their proposed co-lead counsel.

In light of the foregoing, Khodir respectfully submits that he is the presumptive Lead Plaintiff and should be appointed Lead Plaintiff for the Action. III. THE COURT SHOULD APPROVE KHODIR’S SELECTION OF THE FARUQI FIRM AS LEAD COUNSEL Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 78u-4(a)(3)(B)(v), the lead plaintiff is entitled to select and retain lead counsel for the Class, subject to the Court’s approval. Khodir has selected the Faruqi Firm to be Lead Counsel for the Class.

The Court should interfere with the lead plaintiff’s selection of counsel only when necessary “to protect the interests of the class.” Section 21D(a)(3)(B)(iii)(II)(aa), 15 U.S.C. §78u-4(a)(3)(B)(iii)(II)(aa). See also Faro Techs., 2006 WL 1119201, at *2 (“Absent any indication that this choice [of counsel] is not in the best interests of the Class, the case law indicates that such a choice should be respected.”)

Accord- ingly, the Court finds that HGK has the “largest finan- cial interest in the outcome of the litigation.”See15 U.S.C. § 78u-4(a)(3)(B)(iii)(I)(bb). Local 710 argues that it should be appointed a sep- arate lead plaintiff for a subclass of WMB bondholders.FN14Asserting similar justifications as those argued by the Watkins Group, Local 710 contends that no shareholder lead plaintiff movant has the stand- ing required to pursue claims on behalf of the bondhold- ers, and that Local 710's interests will not be adequately represented by a shareholder lead plaintiff.FN15 FN14.

III. THE COURT SHOULD APPROVE THE OHIO FUNDS’ CHOICE OF COUNSEL The PSLRA vests authority in the lead plaintiff to select and retain lead counsel, subject to court approval. 15 U.S.C. § 77z-1(a)(3)(B)(v); 15 U.S.C. § 78u-4(a)(3)(B)(v). The Court should interfere with the lead plaintiff’s selection f counsel only when necessary to “protect the interests of the class.”

In light of the foregoing, Nalakonda respectfully submits that he is the presumptive Lead Plaintiff and should be appointed Lead Plaintiff for the Action. III. THE COURT SHOULD APPROVE NALAKONDA’S SELECTION OF THE FARUQI FIRM AS LEAD COUNSEL Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 78u-4(a)(3)(B)(v), the lead plaintiff is entitled to select and retain lead counsel for the Class, subject to the Court’s approval. Nalakonda has selected the Faruqi Firm to be Lead Counsel for the Class.

In light of the foregoing, the Satcon Investor Group respectfully submits that it should be appointed Lead Plaintiff for the consolidated Actions. III. THE COURT SHOULD APPROVE THE SATCON INVESTOR GROUP’S SELECTION OF THE FARUQI FIRM AS LEAD COUNSEL Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 78u-4(a)(3)(B)(v), the lead plaintiff is entitled to select and retain lead counsel for the Class, subject to the Court’s approval. The Satcon Investor Group has selected the Faruqi Firm to be Lead Counsel for the Class.

Simply put, the Global Pension Funds are the most adequate plaintiffs to oversee this litigation. III. THE COURT SHOULD APPROVE THE GLOBAL PENSION FUNDS’ SELECTION OF CO-LEAD COUNSEL Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 78u-4(a)(3)(B)(v), Lead Plaintiffs are entitled to select and retain Lead Counsel for the Class, subject to the Court’s approval. The Global Pension Funds have Case 1:08-cv-00135-SHS Document 4 Filed 01/10/2008 Page 17 of 20 13 selected Entwistle & Cappucci and SBTK to be Co-Lead Counsel for the Class.