§

N.H. Rev. Stat. § 630:5

Section 630:5 - Procedure in Capital Murder
Section 630:5 - Procedure in Capital Murder

11 Citing briefs

  1. PEOPLE v. CLARK (WILLIAM CLINTON)

    Appellant’s Opening Brief

    Filed June 17, 2005

    Factor (i), both as written and as interpreted by the California Supreme Court in the Lucky decision and its progeny, does just the opposite ofwhatthe 87. See, e.g., Ala. Code §13A-5-51 [age]; Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. §16-11-103 (4)(a) [age]; Fla. Stat. Ann. §921.141 (6) (g) [age]; 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. §911 (e)(4) [age]; Ark. Code Ann. §5-4-605(4) [youth]; Nev. Rev. Stat. §200.035 (6) [youth]; Ohio Rev. Code Ann. §2929.04(b)(4) [youth]; Md. Code Ann., Art. 27, §413(g)(5) [“youthful age”]; Tenn. Code Ann. §39-13-204G)(7) [“youth or advanced age]; N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. §630:5 (VI)(d) [“The defendant was youthful, although not under the age of 18.”| 88. The three states in this group are: Connecticut, Indiana and Montana.

  2. PEOPLE v. BRYANT

    Appellant, Stanley Bryant, Opening Brief

    Filed December 16, 2004

    01(E) (2002); Ark. Code Ann., § 5-4-603(a) (Michie 1987); Colo. Rev.Stat., § 18-1.3-1201(2)(b)dD and § 18-1.3-1201(2)(c) (2002); Conn. Gen. Stat. Ann., § 53a-46a(e) (West 1985); State v. White (Del. 1978) 395 A.2d 1082, 1090; Fla. Stat. Ann., § 921.141(3) (West 1985); Ga. Code Ann., § 17-10-30(c) (Harrison 1990); Idaho Code, § 19-2515(8)(a)-(b) (2003); Ky. Rev.Stat. Ann., § 532.025(3) (Michie 1988); La. Code Crim. Proc. Ann., art. 905.7 (West 1993); Md. Ann. Code,art. 27 § 413(1) (1992); Miss Code Ann., § 99-19-103 (1993); Mont. Code Ann., § 46-18-305 (1993); Neb. Rev.Stat., § 29-2521(2) and § 29-2522 (2002); Nev. Rev. Stat. Ann., § 175.554(3) (Michie 1992); N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann., § 630:5 (IV) (1992); N.M.Stat. Ann., § 31-20A-3 (Michie 1990); Okla. Stat. Ann., tit. 21, § 701.11 (West 1993); 41 Pa. Cons. Stat. Ann., § 9711 (1982); S.C. Code Ann. § 16-3-20(C) (Law.

  3. PEOPLE v. KOPATZ (KIM RAYMOND)

    Appellant’s Opening Brief

    Filed December 19, 2011

    (See Shatz & Rivkind, The California Death Penalty Scheme: Requiemfor Furman?, *7 See Ala. Code § 13A-5-53(b)(3) (1982); Conn. Gen. Stat. Ann. § 53a- 46b(b)(3) (West 1993); Del. Code Ann.tit. 11, § 4209(g)(2) (1992); Ga. Code Ann. § 17-10-35(c)(3) (Harrison 1990); Idaho Code § 192827( c)(3) (1987); Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 532.075(3) (Michie 1985); La. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 905.9.1(1)(c) (West 1984); Miss. Code Ann. § 99-19- 105(3)(c) (1993); Mont. Code Ann. § 46-18-310(3) (1993); Neb. Rev.Stat. §§ 29-2521.01, 03, 29-2522(3) (1989); Nev. Rev. Stat. Ann § 177.055 (d) (Michie 1992); N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 630:5(X1)(c) (1992); N.M.Stat. Ann. § 31-20A-4(c)(4) (Michie 1990); N.C. Gen.Stat. § 15A2000( d)(2) (1983); Ohio Rev. Code Ann. § 2929.05(A) (Baldwin 1992); 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. Ann. § 9711(h)(3)(iii) (1993); S.C. Code Ann. § 16-325( c)(3) (Law.

  4. PEOPLE v. ADAMS

    Appellant’s Opening Brief

    Filed June 22, 2011

    °° *© See Ala. Code § 13A-5-53(b)(3) (1982); Conn. Gen. Stat. Ann. § 53a-46b(b)(3) (West 1993); Del. Code Ann.tit. 11, § 4209(g)(2) (1992); Ga. Code Ann. § 17-10-35(c)(3) (Harrison 1990); Idaho Code § 19- 2827(c)(3) (1987); Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 532.075(3) (Michie 1985); La. Code Crim. Proc. Ann.art. 905.9.1(1)(c) (West 1984); Miss. Code Ann.§ 99-19-105(3)(c) (1993); Mont. Code Ann. § 46-18-310(3) (1993); Neb. Rev.Stat. §§ 29-2521.01, 03, 29-2522(3) (1989); Nev. Rev. Stat. Ann § 177.055 (d) (Michie 1992); N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 630:5(X1)(c) (1992); N.M. Stat. Ann. § 31-20A-4(c)(4) (Michie 1990); N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A- 2000(d)(2) (1983); Ohio Rev. Code Ann. § 2929.05(A) (Baldwin 1992); 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. Ann. § 9711(h)(3)(aii) (1993); S.C. Code Ann. § 16-3- 25(c)(3) (Law. Co-op. 1985); S.D. Codified Laws Ann. § 23A27A-12(3) (1988); Tenn. Code Ann. § 13-206(c)(1)(D) (1993); Va. Code Ann.§ 17.110.1C(2) (Michie 1988); Wash. Rev. Code Ann. § 10.95.130(2)(b) (West 1990); Wyo.Stat. § 6-2-103(d)(iu) (1988).

  5. PEOPLE v. ROMERO (ORLANDO) & SELF (CHRISTOPHER)

    Appellant, Christopher Self, Opening Brief

    Filed September 25, 2006

    See Ariz. Rev.Stat., § 13-703.01(E) (2002); Ark. Code Ann.§ 5-4-603(a) (Michie 1993); Colo. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 18-1.3- 1201(2)(b)(ID)(A) (West 2002); Del. Code Ann., tit. 11, § 4209(c)(3)b.1. (2002); Idaho Code, § 19-2515(3)(b) (2003); Ill. Ann.Stat. ch. 38, para. 9-1(g) (Smith- Hurd 1992); La. Code Crim. Proc. Ann.art. 905.6 (West 1993): Md. Ann. Code art. 27, § 413(4) (1993); Miss. Code Ann. § 99-19-103 (1993); Neb. Rev.Stat., § 29-2520(4)(f) (2002); N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 630:5(IV) (1992); N.M.Stat. Ann. § 31-20A-3 (Michie 1990); Okla. Stat. Ann.tit. 21, § 701.11 (West 1993); 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. Ann. § 9711(c)(1)(iv) (1982); S.C. Code Ann. § 16-3-20(C) (Law.

  6. PEOPLE v. LOPEZ (JUAN M.)

    Appellant’s Opening Brief

    Filed May 25, 2005

    01(E) (2002); Ark. Code Ann., § 5-4-603(a) (Michie 1987); Colo. Rev. Stat., § 18-1.3-1201(2)(b)(II) and § 18-1.3-1201(2)(c) (2002); Conn. Gen.Stat. Ann., § 53a-46a(e) (West 1985); State v. White (Del. 1978) 395 A.2d 1082, 1090; Fla. Stat. Ann., § 921.141(3) (West 1985); Ga. Code Ann., § 17-10-30(c) (Harrison 1990); Idaho Code, § 19- 2515(8)(a)-(b) (2003); Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann., § 532.025(3) (Michie 1988); La. Code Crim. Proc. Ann., art. 905.7 (West 1993); Md. Ann. Codeart 27 § 413(i) (1992); Miss Code Ann., § 99-19-103 (1993); Mont. Code Ann., § 46-18-305 (1993); Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-2521(2) and § 29-2522 (2002); Nev.Rev. Stat. Ann., § 175.554(3) (Michie 1992); N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann., § 630:5 (IV) (1992); N.M. Stat. Ann., § 31-20A-3 (Michie 1990); Okla.Stat. Ann., tit. 21, § 701.11 (West 1993); 41 Pa. Cons. Stat. Ann., § 9711 (1982); S.C. Code Ann. § 16-3-20(C) (Law.

  7. RENO ON H.C.

    Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

    Filed May 10, 2004

    01, 03, 29-2522(3) (1989); Nev. Rev.Stat. Ann. §177.055(d) (Michie 1992); N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. §630:5(XT)(c) (1992); N.M. Stat. Ann. §31- 20A-4(c)(4) (Michie 1990); N.C. Gen. Stat. §15A-2000(d)(2) (1983); Ohio Rev. Code Ann. §2929.05(A) (Baldwin 1992); 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. Ann. §9711(h)(3)(iii) (1993); S.C. Code Ann. §16- 3-25(C)(3) (1988); Tenn. CodeAnn. §13-206(c)(1)(D) (1993); Va. Code Ann. §17.110.1C(2) (Michie 1988); Wash. Rev. Code Ann. §10.95.130(2)(b) (West 1990); Wyo. Stat. §6-2-103(d)(iii) (1988). Also see State v. Dixon (Fla. 1973) 283 So. 2d 1, 10; Alford v. State (Fla.

  8. PEOPLE v. ROUNTREE (CHARLES F.)

    Appellant’s Opening Brief

    Filed September 14, 2009

    Rev. Stat. §§ 29-2521.01, 29-2522(3) (1989); Nev. Rev. Stat. Ann § 177.055 (d) (Michie 1992); N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 630:5(XI)(c}(1992); N.M. Stat. Ann. § 31-20A-4(c)(4) (Michie 1990); N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A- 2000(d)(2) (1983); Ohio Rev. Code Ann. § 2929.05(A) (Baldwin 1992); 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. Ann. § 9711(h)(3)(iii) (1993); S.C. Code Ann. § 16-3- 25(c)(3) (Law. Co-op. 1985); S.D. Codified Laws Ann. § 23A-27A-12(3) (1988); Tenn. Code Ann. § 13-206(c)(1)(D) (1993); Va. Code Ann. § 17.11O.1C(2) (Michie 1988); Wash. Rev. Code Ann. § 10.95.130(2)(b) (West 1990); Wyo. Stat. § 6-2-103(d)(iii) (1988).

  9. PEOPLE v. SANDOVAL (RAMON JR.)

    Appellant’s Opening Brief

    Filed July 12, 2010

    (Penal Code section 190.4, subdivision (b).)'*? The other four states are Alabama, Arizona, /// /// 8 Title 18 United States Code section 3594; Arkansas Code Annotated section 5-4-603, subdivision (c); Colorado Revised Statutes section 18-1.3-1201, subdivision (2)(d); Georgia Code Annotated section 17-10-31, subdivision (c); Idaho Code section 19-2515, subdivision (7)(b); 720 Illinois Compiled Statutes 5/9-1, subdivision (g); Kansas Statutes Annotated section 21-4624, subdivision (e); Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedurearticle 905.8; Maryland Criminal Law Code Annotated section 2-303, subdivision (j)(2); Mississippi Code Annotated section 99-19-101, subdivision (3)(c); Missouri Revised Statutes section 565.030, subdivision (4); New Hampshire Revised Statutes Annotated section 630:5, subdivision (IX); North Carolina General Statutes section 15A-2000, subdivision (b); Oklahoma Statutes Annotatedtitle 21, section 701.11; Ohio Revised Code Annotated section 2929.03, subdivision (D)(2); Oregon Revised Statutes section 163.150, subdivisions (2)(a) & (1)(c)(B); 42 Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes Annotated section 9711, subdivision (c)(1)(v); South Carolina Code Annotated section 16-3-20, subdivision (C); South Dakota Codified Laws section 23A-27A- 4; Tennessee Code Annotated section 39-13-204, subdivision (h); Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Annotatedarticle 37.071.2, subdivision (g); Utah Code Annotated section 76-3-207, subdivision (5)(c); Virginia Code Annotated section 19.2-264.4, subdivision (E); Washington Revised Code Annotated section 10.95.080, subdivision (2); Wyoming Statutes Annotated section 6-2-102, subdivision (d)(ii). ' California previously adhered to the majority rule prohibiting penalty phaseretrials following hung juries.

  10. PEOPLE v. SOUZA (MATTHEW ARIC)

    Appellant's Opening Brief

    Filed January 18, 2005

    Gen.Stat. Ann., § 53a-46a(e) (West 1985); State v. White (Del.1978) 395 A.2d 1082, 1090; Fla. Stat. Ann., § 921.141(3) (West 1985); Ga.Code Ann., § 17-10-30(c) (Harrison 1990); Idaho Code, § 19-2515(8)(a)-(b)(2003); Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann., § 532.025(3) (Michie 1988); La. Code Crim.Proc. Ann., art. 905.7 (West 1993); Md. Ann. Code art 27 § 413(i) (1992);Miss Code Ann., § 99-19-103 (1993); Mont. Code Ann., § 46-18-305(1993); Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-2521(2) and § 29-2522 (2002); Nev. Rev. Stat.Ann., § 175.554(3) (Michie 1992); N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann., § 630:5 ([V)(1992); N.M.Stat. Ann., § 31-20A-3 (Michie 1990); Okla. Stat. Ann., tit.21, § 701.11 (West 1993); 41 Pa. Cons. Stat. Ann., § 9711 (1982); S.C.Code Ann. § 16-3-20(C) (Law.