Haw. Rev. Stat. § 707-732
knowingly subjects to sexual contact an imprisoned person, a person confined to a detention facility, a person committed to the director of corrections and rehabilitation, a person residing in a private correctional facility operating in the State , or a person in custody, or causes such a person to have sexual contact with the actor; or
Paragraphs (b), (c), (d), (e), and (f) shall not be construed to prohibit practitioners licensed under chapter 453 or 455 from performing any act within their respective practices; provided that paragraph (f)(v) shall not be construed to prohibit a law enforcement officer from performing a lawful search pursuant to a warrant or an exception to the warrant clause.
HRS § 707-732
Sexual assault in the fourth degree under § 707-733(1)(a) not an included offense of sexual assault in the third degree under subsection (1)(b) as defined by § 701-109(4).83 Haw. 308,926 P.2d 599. Where age of victim is element of sexual offense, the specified state of mind is not intended to apply to that element; defendant thus strictly liable with respect to attendant circumstance of victim's age in a sexual assault.83 Haw. 308,926 P.2d 599. Sexual assault in the third degree, in violation of subsection (1)(b), is not, and cannot be, a "continuing offense"; each distinct act in violation of this statute constitutes a separate offense under the Hawaii Penal Code.84 H. 1,928 P.2d 843. "Mentally defective". 5 H. App. 659,706 P.2d 1333. Based on § 701-109(4)(a), fourth degree sexual assault under § 707-733(1)(a) is a lesser included offense of third degree sexual assault under subsection (1)(e).85 Haw. 92 (App.),937 P.2d 933. Third degree sexual assault committed in violation of subsection (1)(e) not a continuous offense; defendant's convictions of five counts of that offense, each based on a separate sexual contact thus did not violate § 701-109(1)(e).85 Haw. 92 (App.),937 P.2d 933. Placement of the elemental attendant circumstances after the state of mind in the enumerated elements instruction was not error; when read and considered as a whole, the instructions adequately informed the jury of the prosecution's burden to prove that complainant did not consent to the acts alleged and was not married to defendant at the time, and that defendant was aware of both circumstances when defendant acted.97 Haw. 140 (App.),34 P.3d 1039. Although criminal sanctions are clearly directed only at adult conduct under subsection (1)(b) and § 707-730(1)(b), there is no legislative history that supports a conclusion that only adults were intended to be prohibited from the proscribed sexual conduct; when the legislature amended subsection (1) and § 707-730(1) in 2001, and could have, but did not include language allowing consensual sexual conduct between, for example, two thirteen year olds, the legislative intent was to maintain the existing prohibitions against such conduct.121 Haw. 92 (App.),214 P.3d 1082. Section 707-730(1)(b) and subsection (1)(b), as applied to private consensual acts between two persons, including minors, did not violate minor's right to privacy as the State has at least a significant interest in regulating the sexual activities of children under the age of fourteen; in addition, there is no fundamental personal privacy right for minors under the age of fourteen to engage in sexual activities with other children under the age of fourteen; this applies to young boys, as well as to young girls, and is not strictly dependent on an age differential between the children.121 Haw. 92 (App.),214 P.3d 1082. State's exercise of prosecutorial discretion in the case was not constitutionally infirm where defendant failed to meet the burden of demonstrating that defendant was prosecuted based on an arbitrary classification; defendant was prosecuted under § 707-730 and this section based on allegations that defendant was significantly older than child #1, had initiated the prohibited sexual activities with child #1 and child #2, and had engaged in multiple instances of prohibited sexual contact with more than one child.121 Haw. 92 (App.),214 P.3d 1082.