§

Cal. Evid. Code § 1200

Section 1200 - Hearsay rule
Section 1200 - Hearsay rule

4 Citing briefs

  1. IN RE I.C.

    Appellant’s Opening Brief on the Merits

    Filed December 10, 2015

    (b) Except as provided by law, hearsay evidence is inadmissible. (Cal. Evid. Code § 1200, subd. (a) and (b).) Hearsay evidenceis said to be “unreliable” because the statement might be distorted or misinterpreted by the witnessrelating it in court, the hearsay statement is not made under oath, the person who made the statement cannot be observed by the judge or jury to evaluate his/her credibility and the adverse party has not had the 33 opportunity to cross-examine the person who made them.

  2. DURAN v. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION

    Appellant’s Answer Brief on the Merits

    Filed December 28, 2012

    | Besides violating the trial plan, the survey was inadmissible hearsay proffered as evidence ofthe truth of the actual hours purportedly worked by non-RWGclass members. Evid. Code §1200; People ex rel. Lockyerv. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 116 Cal.App.4th 1253, 1269 (2004); Luquev.

  3. PEOPLE v. EDWARDS (ROBERT)

    Appellant’s Opening Brief

    Filed December 28, 2006

    b. Ms. Ventura’s Testimony was Inadmissible Asnoted above,the trial court did not rule on the merits of Appellant’s hearsay objection, nor did the prosecutor contend that the testimony was admissible under any exception to the hearsay rule. This is unsurprising since Mrs. Deeble’s alleged statement to her daughter that she had hidden the Key outside the door wasplainly inadmissible hearsay under Evidence Code Section 1200. 3.

  4. PEOPLE v. HAJEK & VO

    Appellant, Loi Tan Vo, Reply Brief

    Filed February 27, 2012

    tein (7th Cir. 1979) 601 F.2d 281 ............ 18 Vincent v. Seabold (6th Cir. 2000) 226 F.3d 681 ..............0.0.. 27 Wade v. Calderon (9th Cir. 1994) 29 F.3d 1313 ......... 0.0000 0000. 97 XV Washington v. Texas (1967) 388 U.S. 14.0.0... 0... ccc ce eee 57 Welch v. Simmons (10th Cir. 2006) 451 F.3d 675 .........0..0.. 00000. 57 White v. Illinois (1992) 502 U.S. 346 2.0... ceecee eee 25 Wiggins v. Smith (2003) 539 U.S.510 2...eee45,55 Williams v. Taylor (2000) 529 U.S. 362 1.0.0... ccee 45,55 Williamson v. United States (1994) 512 U.S.594 ... 0.0... eee, 27 Wood v. Georgia (1981) 450 U.S. 261 0...eee76, 78 Woodson v. North Carolina (1976) 408 U.S. 280 ............... passim Zafiro v. United States (1993) 506 U.S. 534 2... ee eee eee 11, 14 Zant v. Stephens (1983) 462 U.S. 862 ............004. 93, 183, 184, 196 RULES AND STATUTES CALCRIM 357, Adoptive Admissions ........... 0.0.00. 0005 161, 178 California Evid. Code § 352) 60...cee 129 California Evid. Code § 664 ceeeeeeeee ees 167 California Evid. Code § 1200 cece ee eee een eee neces 185, 192 California Evid. Code § 1220 .. 0... ceecceee 192 California Evid. Code § 1221 ......... 0... cee eee 162, 179, 192 California Rules of Court, Rule 8.2200(a)(a) ............00005 82, 114, 127, 158, 208, 216, 231, 232 CALJIC 2.10oeeee ene eee eae 182 XV1 CALJIC 3.00 2...ceeeee ene 227 CALJIC 3.01 1.eectene e eens 227 CALJIC 6.10.5 2...eneeee eens 221 CALJIC 6.11 ooteee e enn nee ees 221 CALJIC 6.21 0.eeeeee n ees 217 CALJIC 8.25 21.cecetenes 94, 97 CALJIC 8.26 22.eeete eee eens 221 CALJIC 8.80.1 20.0...eeeee 106, 107, 211, 213, 214 CALJIC 8.81.15 2.eectteen teen eas 97 CALJIC 8.81.18 2.0...cecentres 208 California Penal Code § 187 ..... 0.0... ceeene 128 California Penal Code § 190.2 .... 0... 0. eee eee ee 94, 205 California Penal Code § 190.3 2.0... 0... cece eee 184, 204 California Penal Code § 190.4 2.0... 0...cece 206, 243 California Penal Code § 190.5 1... 0... ccceee nee 239 California Penal Code § 987.9... 0.0...ees 33, 45, 53 California Penal