.) Case 1:15-cv-01066-TFH Document 99 Filed 11/01/17 Page 2 of 5 3 Finally, due to the California state procedure in “preference cases,” Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 36(d), in Lyons Colgate was forced to file its motion for summary judgment before filing its Sargon motions to preclude the plaintiff’s experts’ scientifically unreliable declaration that the Court of Appeal found was sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact. But on a similar record, another division of the California Court of Appeal affirmed a trial court’s preclusion of the same expert’s opinion post-summary judgment, but before trial, and affirmed the jury’s verdict in favor of Colgate.