check_box_outline_blank

check_box_outline_blank
23 Regulations found with keyword search

  1. check_box_outline_blank

    § 33.10 Minimum requirements

    7 C.F.R. § 33.10   

    for export to any foreign destination do not contain apple maggot, and do not have more than 2 percent, by count, of apples with apple maggot injury, nor more than 2 percent, by count, of apples infested

  2. check_box_outline_blank

    § 319.56-39 Fragrant pears from China

    7 C.F.R. § 319.56-39   

    punctiferalis), apple fruit moth (Cydia inopinata), Hawthorn spider mite (Tetranychus viennensis), red plum maggot (Cydia funebrana), brown rot (Monilinia fructigena), Asian pear scab (Venturia nashicola), pear trellis

  3. check_box_outline_blank

    § 9.142 Bennett Valley

    27 C.F.R. § 9.142   

    the viticultural area described in this section is “Bennett Valley”. (b) Approved maps. The appropriate maps for determining the boundary of the Bennett Valley viticultural area are four 1:24,000 scale USGS

    photorevised 1980 (4) Cotati Quadrangle, CA - Sonoma Co. 1954, photorevised 1980 (c) Boundary. The Bennett Valley viticultural area is entirely within Sonoma County, California, and is located northwest of

  4. check_box_outline_blank

    § 9.102 Sonoma Mountain

    27 C.F.R. § 9.102   

    boundary follows the 800-foot contour line westerly, easterly, and northerly to Bennett Valley Road. (4) The boundary follows Bennett Valley Road easterly to Enterprise Road. (5) The boundary follows Enterprise

  5. check_box_outline_blank

    § 776.29 Instrumentalities and channels of interstate commerce

    29 C.F.R. § 776.29   

    not exclude construction employees from being engaged in commerce. 32 Mitchell v. Vollmer, ante; Bennett. v. V. P. Loftis, 167 F. (2d) 286 (C.A. 4); Overstreet v. North Shore Corp., ante; Rockton & Rion

    to instrumentalities of interstate commerce. 38 34 Pedersen v. J. F. Fitzgerald, 318 U.S. 740. 35 Bennett v. V. P. Loftis Co., 167 F. (2d) 286 (C.A. 4). 36 Walling v. McCrady Const. Co., ante. 37 Divins

  6. check_box_outline_blank

    § 776.9 General scope of “in commerce” coverage

    29 C.F.R. § 776.9   Cited 23 times   

    & Dredging Co., 156 F. 2d 334 (C.A. 9); Walling v. McCrady Constr. Co., 156 F. 2d 932 (C.A. 3); Bennett v. V. P. Loftis, 167 F. 2d 286 (C.A. 4); Walling v. Patton-Tully Transp. Co., 134 F. 2d 945 (C.A

  7. check_box_outline_blank

    § 776.30 Construction performed on temporarily idle facilities

    29 C.F.R. § 776.30   Cited 1 times   

    Co. v. McComb, 187 F. (2d) 524 (C.A. 5). 53 Pedersen v. J. F. Fitzgerald Construction Co., ante; Bennett v. V. P. Loftis, ante; Walling v. McCrady Const. Co., ante; and Bodden v. McCormick Shipping Corp

  8. check_box_outline_blank

    § 776.26 Relationship of the construction work to the covered facility

    29 C.F.R. § 776.26   Cited 1 times   

    the covered facility but would not be decisive. 15 Cf. § 776.18(b). 16 Mitchell v. Vollmer, ante; Bennett v. V. P. Loftis Co., ante; Mitchell v. Chambers Const. Co., 214 F. (2d) 515 (C.A. 10); Walling v

  9. check_box_outline_blank

    § 147.1952 Aquifer exemptions

    40 C.F.R. § 147.1952   

    producing sands of the Bradford Field, in McKean County; including the Bradford, West Branch, Stack, Bennett Brook, Marilla Brook, Brooder Hollow, Cyclone, Minard Run, Minard Run School, and Sugar Run (or Watsonville)

  10. check_box_outline_blank

    § 9.69 Yakima Valley

    27 C.F.R. § 9.69   

    Zillah Peak, High Top (elevation 3031 feet), and an unnamed mountain (elevation 3629 feet) to the Bennett Ranch; (2) Then due east approximately 0.2 mile to the boundary of the Hanford Atomic Energy Commission

Access all results
Casetext free trial sign up includes:
Unlimited legal research, no out of plan charges
Federal case law, statutes, and regulations
All 50 state case law and statutes
 CARA A.I. contextual search
Citator: Red flags on all overturned cases
Bankruptcy and PTAB
Unique databases: Holdings and Black Letter Law
How cited functionality
Customer Support