Zelisv.Best Buy Co., Inc.

United States District Court, N.D. CaliforniaMay 13, 2011
Case No. CV11 1096 DMR (N.D. Cal. May. 13, 2011)

Case No. CV11 1096 DMR.

May 13, 2011

ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER CIRESI L.L.P., Michael A. Geibelson, Bar No. 179970, Stephanie C. Santoro, Bar No. 260994, Los Angeles, CA, Attorneys for Defendants, Best Buy Co., Inc.


[ PROPOSED ] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-1


DONNA RYU, Magistrate Judge

Complaint Filed: March 9, 2011

Old Response Date: May 11, 2011

ORDER

Having considered the Second Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint entered into by and between Plaintiff Jason Zelis ("Zelis") and Defendant Best Buy Co., Inc. ("Best Buy"), and good cause appearing therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

Plaintiff will amend the Complaint to name Best Buy Stores, L.P., and not Best Buy Co., Inc. within fifteen (15) days of the date of the outcome of either the petition to the U.S. Judicial Multidistrict Litigation Panel or the motion to transfer the action to the Central District of California, whichever occurs first;

Plaintiff will dismiss the negligence, invasion of privacy, and unlawful intrusion causes of action within fifteen (15) days of the date of the outcome of either the petition to the U.S. Judicial Multidistrict Litigation Panel or the motion to transfer the action to the Central District of California, whichever occurs first;

Best Buy will have fourteen (14) days from the date Plaintiff files his amended complaint to respond to the amended Complaint, and given Plaintiff's dismissal of the negligence, invasion of privacy, and unlawful intrusion claims, Best Buy need only respond to the sole remaining cause of action for violation of California Civil Code § 1747.08.

IT IS SO ORDERED.