From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Yarbrough v. the State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Jan 9, 1917
73 So. 830 (Ala. Crim. App. 1917)

Opinion

Decided January 9, 1917.

APPEAL from Jefferson Criminal Court.

Heard before Hon. A.H. ALSTON.

J.W. DAVIDSON, for appellant. W.L. MARTIN, Attorney General, for the State.



Jim Yarbrough was convicted of crime and he appeals. Affirmed.


(1) The transcript shows certain demurrers that were interposed to the indictment, but if any ruling of the trial court was invoked on these demurrers, it is not shown by the judgment entry or anything appearing in the record. Under these conditions, showing no judgment of the trial court on the demurrers, the record presents no question on the demurrers for review here. — Peters v. State, 100 Ala. 10, 14 So. 896; Broadhead v. State, 145 Ala. 681, 40 So. 216; Powell v. State, 89 Ala. 172, 8 So. 109.

(2) The charges set out in the transcript cannot be reviewed, in the absence of a bill of exceptions, and the record in this case contains nothing purporting to be a bill of exceptions. — Clay v. State, 14 Ala. App. 664, 71 So. 892; Mitchell v. State, 14 Ala. App. 104, 71 So. 982.

We have examined the entire record and find no error.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Yarbrough v. the State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Jan 9, 1917
73 So. 830 (Ala. Crim. App. 1917)
Case details for

Yarbrough v. the State

Case Details

Full title:Yarbrough v. The State. Crime

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Jan 9, 1917

Citations

73 So. 830 (Ala. Crim. App. 1917)
73 So. 830

Citing Cases

Johnson v. State

Failure of the demurrant to secure a ruling on his demurrer is a waiver of the demurrer. Garrett v.…

Bradford v. State

On appeal from the Jefferson county court of misdemeanor, to the circuit court, the defendant was convicted…