Xilinx, Inc.v.Intellitech Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISIONSep 16, 2011
Case No. 3:11-CV-0699-MMC (N.D. Cal. Sep. 16, 2011)

Case No. 3:11-CV-0699-MMC

09-16-2011

XILINX, INC., a Delaware Corporation, Plaintiff, v. INTELLITECH CORPORATION, a New Hampshire Corporation, Defendant.

GLENN E. WESTREICH (SBN 100457) DARRELL D. KINDER (SBN 255810) PATRICK N. LUNDELL (SBN 273506) HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff XILINX, INC. Robert F. Kramer (State Bar No. 181706) Eric Shih (State Bar No. 156102) Stephanie R. Wood (State Bar No. 242572) NOVAK DRUCE + QUIGG LLP Attorneys for Defendant INTELLITECH CORPORATION


GLENN E. WESTREICH (SBN 100457)


DARRELL D. KINDER (SBN 255810)


PATRICK N. LUNDELL (SBN 273506)


HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP


Attorneys for Plaintiff


XILINX, INC.


Robert F. Kramer (State Bar No. 181706)


Eric Shih (State Bar No. 156102)


Stephanie R. Wood (State Bar No. 242572)


NOVAK DRUCE + QUIGG LLP


Attorneys for Defendant


INTELLITECH CORPORATION


JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND PATENT LOCAL RULE 4-2 EXCHANGE BY ONE DAY


The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney

Plaintiff Xilinx, Inc. ("XILINX") and Defendant Intellitech Corporation ("INTELLITECH") hereby stipulate and agree to extend the date to exchange proposed constructions and extrinsic evidence pursuant to N.D. California Patent Local Rule 4-2 by one day from the Court ordered deadline of September 15, 2011 [Dkt. Nos. 28 (Order) and 23 (Dates)] to September 16, 2011.

By: Stephanie Wood


NOVAK DRUCE + QUIGG LLP


Attorney for Defendant


INTELLITECH CORPORATION


By: Patrick Lundell


HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP


Attorney for Plaintiff


XILINX, INC.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Hon. Maxine M. Chesney


United States District Judge