From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Woods v. Gaetz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
Oct 18, 2012
Case No. 10-cv-870-JPG (S.D. Ill. Oct. 18, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 10-cv-870-JPG

10-18-2012

HARLIS WOODS, Plaintiff, v. DONALD GAETZ, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation ("Report") (Doc. 163) of Magistrate Judge Philip M. Frazier recommending that the Court grant defendant Monica Greathouse's motion for summary judgment (Doc. 124).

The Court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations of the magistrate judge in a report and recommendation. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). The Court must review de novo the portions of the report to which objections are made. Id. "If no objection or only partial objection is made, the district court judge reviews those unobjected portions for clear error." Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999).

The Court has received no objection to the Report. The Court has reviewed the entire file and finds that the Report is not clearly erroneous. Accordingly, the Court hereby:

• ADOPTS the Report in its entirety (Doc. 163);
• GRANTS Greathouse's motion for summary judgment (Doc. 124); and
• DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to enter judgment accordingly at the close of the case. Greathouse is terminated from this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________

J. PHIL GILBERT

DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Woods v. Gaetz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
Oct 18, 2012
Case No. 10-cv-870-JPG (S.D. Ill. Oct. 18, 2012)
Case details for

Woods v. Gaetz

Case Details

Full title:HARLIS WOODS, Plaintiff, v. DONALD GAETZ, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Date published: Oct 18, 2012

Citations

Case No. 10-cv-870-JPG (S.D. Ill. Oct. 18, 2012)