Womack
v.
State

Court of Criminal Appeals of TexasJan 25, 1956
286 S.W.2d 140 (Tex. Crim. App. 1956)
286 S.W.2d 140162 Tex. Crim. 435

Cases citing this case

How cited

  • Shultz v. State

    …Motions to quash and in arrest of judgment were overruled.It has long been the rule that a complaint sworn to…

lock 1 Citing casekeyboard_arrow_right

No. 27967.

January 25, 1956.

Appeal from the County Court, Howard County, R. H. Weaver, J.

Thomas Thomas, Big Spring, for appellant.

Harvey C. Hooser, Jr., County Atty., Big Spring, Leon B. Douglas, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.


The conviction is for driving a motor vehicle upon a public highway while intoxicated; the punishment, 3 days in jail and a fine of $50.

The complaint and information were filed on February 14, 1955, and bear the signature of the County Attorney.

A motion for arrest of judgment was filed and upon the hearing on such motion it was stipulated that the complaint was not signed nor sworn to before the County Attorney before it was filed or before the information was filed, and the jurat of such complaint showing that it was signed and sworn to before the County Attorney on February 14, 1955, was not true.

In view of such stipulations it is evident that at the time the information was filed and presented, there was no valid complaint which could form a basis for the information. A valid complaint is a prerequisite to a valid information. Art. 415, C.C.P.; Byrom v. State, 158 Tex.Crim. R., 256 S.W.2d 853.

A complaint sworn to after the information has been presented will not support a conviction. Billingslea v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 268 S.W.2d 668; Baker v. State, 159 Tex.Crim. R., 265 S.W.2d 600.

The judgment is reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed.