From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Dec 20, 2005
180 S.W.3d 50 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005)

Opinion

No. ED 85990.

December 20, 2005.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Louis County; John F. Kintz, Judge.

Lisa M. Stroup, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.

Deborah Daniels, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.

Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J., BOOKER T. SHAW, J.


ORDER


Movant, Belinda Williams, appeals from the judgment denying her Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, movant argues that her trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance during cross-examination of movant's daughter.

The motion court's findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Williams v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Dec 20, 2005
180 S.W.3d 50 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005)
Case details for

Williams v. State

Case Details

Full title:Belinda WILLIAMS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District

Date published: Dec 20, 2005

Citations

180 S.W.3d 50 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005)