Williams
v.
JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA

This case is not covered by Casetext's citator
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISIONOct 28, 2011
CASE NO. 11 B 29467 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. Oct. 28, 2011)

CASE NO. 11 B 29467 ADV. NO. 11 AP 01866

10-28-2011

Demetria Williams Plaintiff, v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N. A. Defendant.

Robert J. Semrad & Associates Attorney for Debtor


Judge Hon.

FINDINGS OF FACT

A. The Parties

1. The Plaintiff is Demetria Williams ("Plaintiff).

2. The Defendant is JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. ("Defendant").

B. Factual Background

1. On or about July 18,2011, Plaintiff filed a petition for relief under Chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code.

2. Plaintiff owns the real estate commonly known as 5544 W. Van Buren Street, Chicago, IL 60644.

3. That PNC Mortgage holds a first mortgage lien on the real property commonly known as 5544 W. Van Buren Street, Chicago, IL 60644, with a secured claim of $192,041.00 pursuant to the Plaintiff's recent credit report.

4. The Defendant holds a second mortgage lien on the real property known as 5544 W. Van Buren Street, Chicago, IL 60644 in the secured amount of $31,160.83 pursuant to the proof of claim filed on August 11, 2011 by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A..

5. That the Plaintiff obtained an appraisal of the property on August 2, 2011 which indicates the value of 5544 W. Van Buren Street, Chicago, IL 60644 to be $90,000.00.

6. The first mortgage lien of PNC Mortgage is a secured claim based on the mortgage recorded on December 4, 2006 as document number 0633802319 with the Cook County Recorder of Deeds, Illinois.

7. The second mortgage lien of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. is a secured claim based on the mortgage recorded on March 31, 2008 as document number 0809148055 with the Cook County Recorder of Deeds, Illinois.

8. The Modified Chapter 13 Plan filed on September 1,2011 provides the Plaintiff will make monthly payments to the Chapter 13 Trustee in the amount of $200.00 per month for 36 months.

9. Under the Chapter 13 Plan, general unsecured creditors will be paid a dividend of ten percent (10%) of their allowed claims.

10. On September 9, 2011, Plaintiff issued a summons and complaint pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 506(a) and Bankruptcy Rule 3012 to determine the validity of Defendant's lien on Plaintiff's property located at 5544 W. Van Buren Street, Chicago, IL 60644.

11. That on September 9, 2011, a copy of the summons and complaint was served in accordance with Rule 7004 of the Federal Rules of the Bankruptcy Procedure by Regular U.S. Mail, postage prepaid to an officer of the Defendant at 270 Park Ave. New York, NY 10017, and upon the registered agent at 208 S. LaSalle St. STE. 814, Chicago, IL 60604.

12. The summons indicated that a motion or answer was required within 35 days of issuance; to date, no responsive pleading has been filed.

13. No evidence has been presented to challenge the validity of the secured claim that holds priority over the second mortgage lien.

14. No evidence has been presented to challenge the appraised value of $90,000.00.

15. The first secured claim of PNC Bank in the amount of $192,041.00 exhausts the value and equity in Plaintiff's residence.

16. There is no value or equity to support the claim of the Defendant.

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

A. Jurisdiction

1. This contested matter is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(K). This court has jurisdiction overt this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 157(a) and 1334(b).

2. Venue is proper in this district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1409. B. Argument

3. This action was initiated under 11 U.S.C. § 506(a) and F. R. Bankr. P. 3012.

4. The Debtor scheduled the first secured claim of PNC Bank in the amount of $192,041.00, and the second secured claim of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. in the amount of $31,091.00

5. That value of Plaintiff's residence is $90,000.00.

6. To the extent that a lien secures a claim against the debtor that is not an allowed secured claim, such lien is void..." 11 U.S.C. § 506(d). If a debtor's chapter 13 case is dismissed then any lien voided under § 506(d) is reinstated. 11 U.S.C. $349(b)(1)(C). Although the Seventh Circuit has not yet considered the issue, the vast majority of circuits hold a wholly unsecured junior mortgage is subject to strip off pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §5 06(d), notwithstanding the anti-modification protection afforded holders of home mortgages in 11 U.S.C. § 1322(b)(2) as implied by Nobelman v. American Savings Bank, 508 U.S. 324 (1993). 'See Pond v. Farm Specialist Realty (In re Pond), 252 F.3d 122 (2nd Cir. 2001); McDonald v. Master Fin., Inc. (In re McDonald), 205 F.3d 606 (3rd Cir. 2000); In re Bartee, 212 F.3d 277 (5th Cir. 2000); In re Lane, 280 F.3d 663 (6th Cir. 2002); Zimmer v. PSB Lending Corp., 313 F.3d 1220 (9th Cir. 2002); and In re Tanner. 217 F.3d 1357 (11th Cir. 2000).

Enter:

___________


United States Bankruptcy Judge


Robert J. Semrad & Associates


Attorney for Debtor