From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Voakes v. AT&T Communications

U.S.
Oct 3, 1994
513 U.S. 1094 (1994)

Summary

prosecuting attorneys engaged in prosecutorial misconduct when they recklessly disregarded their obligation to provide information specifically requested by detainee, thereby endangering detainee's defense

Summary of this case from Wang v. Reno

Opinion

No. 94-239.

October 3, 1994.


Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Certiorari denied. JUSTICE O'CONNOR took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition. Reported below: 21 Cal. App. 4th 1673, 26 Cal. Rptr. 2d 802.


Summaries of

Voakes v. AT&T Communications

U.S.
Oct 3, 1994
513 U.S. 1094 (1994)

prosecuting attorneys engaged in prosecutorial misconduct when they recklessly disregarded their obligation to provide information specifically requested by detainee, thereby endangering detainee's defense

Summary of this case from Wang v. Reno
Case details for

Voakes v. AT&T Communications

Case Details

Full title:VOAKES v. AT&T COMMUNICATIONS, INC., ET AL

Court:U.S.

Date published: Oct 3, 1994

Citations

513 U.S. 1094 (1994)
115 S. Ct. 295

Citing Cases

United States v. Morris

See, e.g., In re Wells Fargo Sec. Litig., 12 F.3d 922, 927 (9th Cir. 1993), cert. denied, 115 S.Ct. 295…

In re Syntex Corp. Securities Litigation

We review de novo the district court's order dismissing a case for failure to state a claim. In re Wells…