Verrier
v.
Reno

This case is not covered by Casetext's citator
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISIONNov 22, 2017
Case No: 2:17-cv-204-FtM-99CM (M.D. Fla. Nov. 22, 2017)

Case No: 2:17-cv-204-FtM-99CM

11-22-2017

JOSEPH VERRIER, Plaintiff, v. MICHELLE RENO, ROBYNE WEHLE and BRADLEY ROUSKEY, Defendants.


OPINION AND ORDER

Disclaimer: Documents filed in CM/ECF may contain hyperlinks to other documents or websites. These hyperlinks are provided only for users' convenience. Users are cautioned that hyperlinked documents in CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By allowing hyperlinks to other websites, this Court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their websites. Likewise, the Court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their websites. The Court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the Court. --------

This matter comes before the Court on United States Magistrate Judge Carol Mirando's Report and Recommendation. (Doc. 9). Judge Mirando recommends denying Plaintiff Joseph Verrier request to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 2) and dismissing the case without prejudice. (Doc. 9). Verrier objects to the Report and Recommendation, arguing that it ignores his due process claim and other arguments in the Complaint. (Doc. 10). The Report and Recommendation is thus ripe for review.

A district judge "may accept, reject, or modify in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The district judge "shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made." Id. And "[t]he judge may also receive further evidence or recommit the matter to the magistrate judge with instructions." Id.

After examining the file carefully and independently, and upon considering Judge Mirando's findings and recommendations, the Court accepts and adopts the Report and Recommendation over Verrier's objections.

Accordingly, it is now

ORDERED:

(1) The Report and Recommendation is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED and the findings incorporated herein.
(2) Plaintiff Joseph Verrier request to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 2) is DENIED.
(3) Verrier's motion to proceed as an independent case (Doc. 8) is DENIED as moot.
(4) The Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. Verrier may file an amended complaint - after paying the applicable filing fee to the Clerk of Court - on or before December 13, 2017. Failure to comply with this Order may result in the Court closing this case.


DONE
and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida this 22nd day of November 2017.

/s/ _________


SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL


UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Copies: All Parties of Record