From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Velasco v. Montgomery

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 10, 2019
Case No. CV 17-5678-JAK (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 10, 2019)

Opinion

Case No. CV 17-5678-JAK (JEM)

07-10-2019

CARLOS ELOI VELASCO, Petitioner, v. W. L. MONTGOMERY, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Petitioner has filed Objections, and the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied; and (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing the action with prejudice. DATED: July 10, 2019

/s/_________

JOHN A. KRONSTADT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Velasco v. Montgomery

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 10, 2019
Case No. CV 17-5678-JAK (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 10, 2019)
Case details for

Velasco v. Montgomery

Case Details

Full title:CARLOS ELOI VELASCO, Petitioner, v. W. L. MONTGOMERY, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 10, 2019

Citations

Case No. CV 17-5678-JAK (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 10, 2019)