From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vedachalam v. Tata Consultancy Servs., Ltd.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 8, 2012
CASE NO. C 06-0963 (CW) (N.D. Cal. Nov. 8, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. C 06-0963 (CW)

11-08-2012

GOPI VEDACHALAM and KANGANA BERI, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES, LTD, an Indian Corporation; and TATA SONS, LTD, an Indian Corporation, Defendants.

Steven M. Tindall (State Bar No. 187862) Rosha Jones (State Bar No. 279143) RUKIN HYLAND DORIA & TINDALL LLP Kelly M. Dermody (State Bar No. 171716) Daniel M. Hutchinson (State Bar No. 239458) Anne B. Shaver (State Bar No. 255928) LIEFF, CABRASER, HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LP Counsel for Plaintiffs and the National and California Classes


Steven M. Tindall (State Bar No. 187862)
Rosha Jones (State Bar No. 279143)
RUKIN HYLAND DORIA & TINDALL LLP
Kelly M. Dermody (State Bar No. 171716)
Daniel M. Hutchinson (State Bar No. 239458)
Anne B. Shaver (State Bar No. 255928)
LIEFF, CABRASER, HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LP
Counsel for Plaintiffs and the National and California
Classes

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO

STAY COURT DEADLINES

STIPULATION

Plaintiffs Gopi Vedachalam and Kangana Beri ("Plaintiffs"), on behalf of themselves and the PlaintiffNational and California Classes, and Defendants Tata Consultancy Services, Ltd. and Tata Sons, Ltd. (together, "Defendants") hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

WHEREAS, the parties conducted a private mediation before Susan Haldeman on October 16 and 17, 2012, as well as additional telephonic conferences with Ms. Haldeman;

WHEREAS, the parties are continuing their mediation discussions in an effort to resolve this matter;

WHEREAS, to facilitate those discussions, the parties respectfully request that this Court stay all Court deadlines for 90 days, though the parties intend to use their best efforts to complete their negotiation within the next 45 days and inform the Court of their progress at that time;

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED that this litigation be stayed until

Respectfully submitted,

RUKIN HYLAND DORIA & TINDALL LLP

By: ____________

Steven M. Tindall

Rosha Jones (State Bar No.279143)

LIEFF, CABRASER, HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP

By: ____________

Kelly M. Dermody (State Bar No. 171716)

Daniel M. Hutchinson (State Bar No. 239458)

Anne Shaver (State Bar No. 255928)

Counsel for Plaintiffs and the National and

California Classes

LOEB & LOEB, LLP

By: ____________

Michelle La Mar (State Bar No. 163038)

John Daryanani (State Bar No.205149)

10100 Santa Monica Boulevard, Suite 2200

KELLEY DRYE & WARREN, LLP

By: ____________

William A. Escobar (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)

Robert I. Steiner (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)

Kevin J. Smith (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)

Attorneys for Defendants TATA CONSULTANCY

SERVICES, LTD., and TATA SONS, LTD.

In light of the parties' stipulation regarding their ongoing attempts to resolve this matter, the Court concludes that, in the interests of judicial efficiency, all litigation and all deadlines in the matter should be stayed, and are hereby stayed, for 90 days.

The parties are to provide the Court with an update of their status by February 4, 2013. IT IS SO ORDERED. All existing deadlines are extended by 90 days, except the pretrial and trial dates.

By: ____________

HON. CLAUDIA WILKEN

United States District Court Judge


Summaries of

Vedachalam v. Tata Consultancy Servs., Ltd.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 8, 2012
CASE NO. C 06-0963 (CW) (N.D. Cal. Nov. 8, 2012)
Case details for

Vedachalam v. Tata Consultancy Servs., Ltd.

Case Details

Full title:GOPI VEDACHALAM and KANGANA BERI, on behalf of themselves and all others…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 8, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. C 06-0963 (CW) (N.D. Cal. Nov. 8, 2012)