Vangel v. Vangel

1 Citing brief

  1. Geoffrey Gelman, Respondent,v.Antonio Buehler, Appellant.

    Brief

    Filed February 7, 2013

    637, 641-642 [194 P. 1037] Where a partnership agreement provided that money advanced by one partner was to be repaid "'only out of funds accumulated from the operation of the ranch or a sale' thereof”, the partnership was found not to be at will. Vangel v. Vangel, 116 Cal.App.2d 615, 625 [254 P.2d 919]. A partnership whose purposes included “first, to purchase the two cemeteries in issue, and second, to sell the cemetery lots or plots contained therein to the public at a profit” was ruled a partnership “for a particular purpose, and not terminable at the will of the parties”.