From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

VAN TUYL, JR. v. SULLIVAN

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 1, 1916
175 App. Div. 946 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)

Opinion

November, 1916.


Order in so far as appealed from reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion to bring in the said respondents by supplemental summons and complaint, as defendants in the action, granted, upon the ground that as to the respondents the six years' limitation imposed by section 120 of chapter 369 of the Laws of 1914 was in effect and applicable when the motion was made, and that such limitation began to run only after the expiration of the thirty-day period provided by section 80 of that act, upon the authority of Hulbert v. Clark ( 128 N.Y. 295, 297); Sackheim v. Pigueron (215 id. 62, 73); Handy v. Draper (89 id. 334). (See, also, Van Tuyl v. Schwab, 172 App. Div. 670, 674.) Jenks, P.J., Carr, Mills, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.


Summaries of

VAN TUYL, JR. v. SULLIVAN

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 1, 1916
175 App. Div. 946 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)
Case details for

VAN TUYL, JR. v. SULLIVAN

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE C. VAN TUYL, JR., as Superintendent of Banks of the State of New…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 1, 1916

Citations

175 App. Div. 946 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)