Van Smith
v.
Lindamood

This case is not covered by Casetext's citator
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE COLUMBIA DIVISIONAug 17, 2018
Case No. 1:16-0086 (M.D. Tenn. Aug. 17, 2018)

Case No. 1:16-0086

08-17-2018

VAN SMITH #547356 Plaintiff(s) v. CHERRY LINDAMOOD, et al. Defendant(s)


Judge Campbell /Frensley REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The undersigned previously entered an Order on July 30, 2018 (Docket No. 31), requiring Plaintiff to file with the Court a written explanation showing cause for his failure to serve Defendants within 90 days after the filing of the Complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m). The Order required Plaintiff to file such explanation within fourteen (14) days of the date of entry of the Order, and it also stated "If Plaintiff fails to comply with the provisions of this Order, the undersigned will recommend that this action be dismissed without prejudice."

As of the date of the filing of this Report and Recommendation, Plaintiff has failed to comply with the Court's previous Order. Therefore, the undersigned recommends that this case be dismissed without prejudice.

Under Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, any party has fourteen (14) days after service of this Report and Recommendation in which to file any written objections to the Recommendation with the District Court. Any party opposing said objections shall have fourteen (14) days after service of any objections filed to this Report in which to file any response to said objections. Failure to file specific objections within fourteen (14) days of service of this Report and Recommendation can constitute a waiver of further appeal of this Recommendation. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 106 S.Ct. 466, 88 L. Ed. 2d 435 (1985), reh'g denied,474 U.S. 111 (1986); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72.

/s/_________


JEFFERY S. FRENSLEY


United States Magistrate Judge