Valentine
v.
Nebuad, Inc.

This case is not covered by Casetext's citator
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIAAug 9, 2011
No. C08-cv-05113 (TEH) (N.D. Cal. Aug. 9, 2011)

Cases citing this case

How cited

lock 14 Citing caseskeyboard_arrow_right

Summaries written by judges

Summaries

No. C08-cv-05113 (TEH)

08-09-2011

DAN VALENTINE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. NEBUAD, INC., et al., Defendants.

SCOTT KAMBER ( pro hac vice ) DAVID A. STAMPLEY KAMBERLAW, LLC JOSEPH H. MALLEY ( pro hac vice ) LAW OFFICE OF JOSEPH H. MALLEY, P.C. DAVID C. PARISI (SBN 162248) SUZANNE HAVENS BECKMAN (SBN 188814) PARISI & HAVENS LLP Attorneys for Plaintiffs. ROBERT A. WEIKERT (State Bar No. 121146) TALLEY E. MCINTYRE (State Bar No. 203131) NIXON PEABODY LLP JASON C. KRAVITZ ( pro hac vice ) NIXON PEABODY LLP Attorneys for Defendant, NEBUAD, INC.


SCOTT KAMBER (pro hac vice)


DAVID A. STAMPLEY


KAMBERLAW, LLC


JOSEPH H. MALLEY (pro hac vice)


LAW OFFICE OF JOSEPH H. MALLEY, P.C.


DAVID C. PARISI (SBN 162248)


SUZANNE HAVENS BECKMAN (SBN 188814)


PARISI & HAVENS LLP


Attorneys for Plaintiffs.

ROBERT A. WEIKERT (State Bar No. 121146)


TALLEY E. MCINTYRE (State Bar No. 203131)


NIXON PEABODY LLP


JASON C. KRAVITZ (pro hac vice)


NIXON PEABODY LLP


Attorneys for Defendant, NEBUAD, INC.

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE DATE FOR FILING OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL MOTION

Hon. Thelton E. Henderson.

Complaint Filed: November 10, 2008


Trial Date: None Set

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1, Plaintiffs and Defendant NebuAd, Inc. ("NebuAd") hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

1. On June 20, 2011, the Court held a Case Management Conference and directed Plaintiffs to file a Motion for Preliminary Approval on or before August 8, 2011 and set the motion hearing for Monday, September 12, 2011 at 3:00 p.m. (DKT. 230.)

2. Plaintiffs' counsel are in the process of obtaining client approval of their motion for preliminary approval of settlement and, owing to vacation schedules, respectfully request a one-week delay in the deadline for the filing of such papers.

3. Plaintiffs believe such motion will not be contested or the subject of response and therefore respectfully request that the September 12, 2011 date for the hearing of such motion remain undisturbed.

4. In light of the foregoing, the Parties respectfully request the Court's endorsement of the stipulation herein to continue the date for Plaintiffs' filing of their motion for preliminary approval of settlement.

Respectfully submitted, KamberLaw, LLC

DAVID A. STAMPLEY


Attorneys for Plaintiffs


Nixon Peabody LLP

JASON C. KRAVITZ


Attorneys for Defendant NebuAd, Inc.

BRIAN J. PANISH (SBN 116060, N.D. Cal. adm. pending)


RAHUL RAVIPUDI (SBN 204519, N.D. Cal. adm. pending)


PANISH, SHEA & BOYLE, LLP


Attorneys for Plaintiff Dan Valentine

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.