From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S.B.M. v. Studio

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 13, 2007
46 A.D.3d 317 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

Opinion

No. 2346 601553/04.

December 13, 2007.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Rosalyn Richter, J.), entered September 27, 2006, which, to the extent appealed from, awarded plaintiff $30,066.68, plus interest and costs, as against defendant Ray Downing, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Before: Tom, J.P., Andrias, Gonzalez and Sweeny, JJ.


The guaranty at issue, which is to be strictly construed ( see White Rose Food v Saleh, 99 NY2d 589, 591), unambiguously provided that in the event the corporate defendant exercised its right to terminate its 10-year lease so long as certain conditions were satisfied, including the tenant's forfeiture of the security deposit and payment of all rent and additional rent due, defendant guarantor's obligation would be limited to the equivalent of four months' rent. To find, as defendant urges, that under such circumstances he would have no obligation at all would be to impermissibly "excise terms or distort the meaning of those used to make a new contract for the parties" ( Kailasanathan v Mysorekar, 234 AD2d 425, 426). Defendant's strained, piecemeal reading of the challenged guaranty language fails to create ambiguity where none exists in the instrument itself ( see W.W.W. Assoc. v Giancontieri, 77 NY2d 157, 163).


Summaries of

U.S.B.M. v. Studio

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 13, 2007
46 A.D.3d 317 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
Case details for

U.S.B.M. v. Studio

Case Details

Full title:U.S.B.M. REALTY CO., INC., Respondent, v. STUDIO MACBETH, INC., Defendant…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 13, 2007

Citations

46 A.D.3d 317 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 9880
847 N.Y.S.2d 189

Citing Cases

Sportswear Realties Associates v. Greenberg

The guaranty at issue is to be strictly construed (U.S.B.M. Realty Co. v Studio MacBeth, Inc., 46 AD3d 317,…

Roberta L. v. Koeppel

To the extent that the undated memorandum's terms conflict on the termination issue, no affidavit was…