Filed August 20, 2018
See Thompson, 307 F. Supp. 3d at 775 ("When evaluating the validity of an individual's consent under the Fourth Amendment, the Sixth Circuit has stated that 'not any type of consent will suffice, but instead, only consent that is unequivocally, specifically, and intelligently given, uncontaminated by any duress and coercion.’ United States v. Case 2:17-cv-01452-MWF-E Document 72 Filed 08/20/18 Page 14 of 27 Page ID #:1507 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -8- Worley, 193 F.3d 380, 386 (6th Cir. 1999)") (second quotation omitted); See also Shaibu, 920 F.2d at 1425–26 (it is the government’s burden to prove consent was given with “no duress or coercion, express or implied. Consent must be “unequivocal and specific” and “freely and intelligently given”).