This case is not covered by Casetext's citator
United States District Court, D. VermontAug 3, 2011
File No. 2:08 CR 23-4. (D. Vt. Aug. 3, 2011)

File No. 2:08 CR 23-4.

August 3, 2011


The Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed June 20, 2011. After careful review of the file and the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, no objections having been filed by any party, this Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's recommendations in full for the reasons stated in the Report.

A district judge must make a de novo determination of those portions of a magistrate judge's report and recommendation to which an objection is made. Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Perez-Rubio v. Wyckoff, 718 F.Supp. 217, 227 (S.D.N.Y. 1989). The district judge may "accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the magistrate's proposed findings and recommendations." Id.

The defendant's motion for a new trial (Doc. 157) is DENIED.

An alternative to Lexis that does not break the bank.

Casetext does more than Lexis for less than $65 per month.