U.S.
v.
Vasquez-Ortiz

This case is not covered by Casetext's citator
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth CircuitFeb 7, 2007
215 Fed. Appx. 394 (5th Cir. 2007)

No. 06-40395, Conference Calendar.

February 7, 2007.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney's Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, Plaintiff-Appellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Laura Fletcher Leavitt, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender's Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, USDC No. 7:05-CR-800-ALL.

Before REAVLEY, JOLLY, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.


Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Sergio Vasquez-Ortiz raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government's motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.


An alternative to Lexis that does not break the bank.

Casetext does more than Lexis for less than $65 per month.