U.S.
v.
Umanzor-Pleitez

Not overruled or negatively treated on appealinfoCoverage
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth CircuitDec 5, 2007
256 Fed. Appx. 738 (5th Cir. 2007)

No. 07-50616. Conference Calendar.

December 5, 2007.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney's Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Luis Gutierrez, El Paso, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, USDC No. 3:07-CR-06-1.

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.


Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Mario Alonso Umanzor-Pleitez raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. United States v. Pineda-Arrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), cert. denied ___ U.S. ___, 128 S.Ct. 872, 169 L.Ed.2d 737 (2008). The Government's motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.


An alternative to Lexis that does not break the bank.

Casetext does more than Lexis for less than $65 per month.