U.S.
v.
Thompson

This case is not covered by Casetext's citator
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth CircuitJun 23, 2009
329 Fed. Appx. 119 (9th Cir. 2009)

No. 08-30356.

Submitted June 16, 2009.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).

Filed June 23, 2009.

Marcia Kay Hurd, Esquire, Assistant U.S., USBI — Office of the U.S. Attorney, Billings, MT, Plaintiff-Appellee.

Darla Jean Mondou, Esquire, Mondou Law Office, Marana, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana, Jack D. Shanstrom, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. 1:99-CR-00112-JDS.

Before: PAEZ, TALLMAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.



MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


Anthony Jerome Thompson appeals from the 10-month sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Thompson's counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.