From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Peralta-Ramirez

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Feb 20, 2008
266 F. App'x 360 (5th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 07-20356 Conference Calendar.

February 20, 2008.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney's Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Marvin Arturo Peralta-Ramirez, Federal Correctional Institution Edgefield, Edgefield, SC, for Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, USDC No. 4:04-CR-150-6.

Before KING, WIENER, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.


Marvin Arturo Peralta-Ramirez (Peralta) was convicted of conspiracy to smuggle illegal aliens into the United States and related crimes, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324 and 18 U.S.C. § 1203. Peralta's conviction and sentence were affirmed on direct appeal. See United States v. Ibarra-Zelaya, 465 F.3d 596 (5th Cir. 2006), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 127 S.Ct. 992, 166 L.Ed.2d 749 (2007). Peralta appeals the district court's denial of his motion for free copies of court records and trial transcripts. Peralta alleges that he is entitled to free copies of various court documents and transcripts so that he may proceed with a request for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255.

An indigent defendant has no constitutional right to acquire a free copy of his transcript or other court records for use in a collateral proceeding. See United States v. MacCollom, 426 U.S. 317, 325-26, 96 S.Ct. 2086, 48 L.Ed.2d 666 (1976). When Peralta filed his motions for court documents in the district court, he did not have a § 2255 motion pending before the district court. Thus, Peralta is not entitled to receive the documents in question. See United States v. Carvajal, 989 F.2d 170, 170 (5th Cir. 1993); Walker v. United States, 424 F.2d 278, 278-79 (5th Cir. 1970).

Accordingly, the district court did not err in denying Peralta's motion. The appeal is dismissed as frivolous. 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. We caution Peralta that the filing of frivolous appeals may result in the imposition of sanctions. These sanctions may include dismissal, monetary sanctions, and restrictions on his ability to file pleadings in this court and any court subject to this court's jurisdiction. Peralta should review any pending appeals to ensure that they are not frivolous.

APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Peralta-Ramirez

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Feb 20, 2008
266 F. App'x 360 (5th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

U.S. v. Peralta-Ramirez

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Marvin Arturo…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Feb 20, 2008

Citations

266 F. App'x 360 (5th Cir. 2008)

Citing Cases

Hudgens v. United States

See Gossett, 2019 WL 7811193, at *1; United States v. Brito, Cr. No. C-07-398, 2008 WL 4747208 (S.D. Tex.…

U.S. v. Ramos-Barrera

A defendant has no constitutional right to acquire a free copy of his transcript or other court records for…