From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Montgomery

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division
Oct 29, 2007
No. 05 CR 134 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 29, 2007)

Opinion

No. 05 CR 134.

October 29, 2007


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER


Defendant has filed a section 2255 motion and moves for appointment of counsel and an appellate bond as well. All three motions are denied.

Defendant was convicted upon a plea of guilty. Although his restitution order is capped at $593.63, the loss related to the count to which he plead guilty, the relevant conduct loss is far greater, exceeding $200,000. The sentence was within the guidelines and less than the statutory maximum. This court lacks jurisdiction to review an otherwise lawful sentence, which this was. Defendant provides no valid reason why the sentence is subject to collateral attack, and we are unaware of any possible reasons.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Montgomery

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division
Oct 29, 2007
No. 05 CR 134 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 29, 2007)
Case details for

U.S. v. Montgomery

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. LEPIZE Q. MONTGOMERY, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division

Date published: Oct 29, 2007

Citations

No. 05 CR 134 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 29, 2007)