From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. McKenzie

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division
Jun 27, 2005
No. 05 C 362 (N.D. Ill. Jun. 27, 2005)

Opinion

No. 05 C 362.

June 27, 2005


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER


Patrick McKenzie has filed a petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § ("section") 2255 to vacate his conviction and sentence. See 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ("A prisoner in custody under sentence of a court established by Act of Congress claiming the right to be released upon the ground that the sentence was imposed in violation of the Constitution or laws of the United States, or that the court was without jurisdiction to impose such sentence, . . . may move the court which imposed the sentence to vacate, set aside or correct the sentence.") McKenzie argues that his sentence was imposed in violation of the Sixth Amendment because the Court made findings of fact that led to the enhancement of his sentence. McKenzie relies upon Blakely v. Washington, ___ U.S. ___, 124 S.Ct 2531 (2004) and United States v. Booker, ___ U.S. ___, 125 S.Ct. 738 (2005), to assert that he was entitled to have a jury determine these facts. However, the Seventh Circuit has held that the rights enumerated in Booker do not apply retroactively on collateral review. McReynolds v. United States, 397 F.3d 479, 481 (7th Cir. 2005). Because McKenzie's sentence was imposed long before the Booker decision was handed down, he cannot show that he is entitled to a modification of his sentence based on that decision. His § 2255 petition is therefore denied. This is a final and appealable order.


Summaries of

U.S. v. McKenzie

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division
Jun 27, 2005
No. 05 C 362 (N.D. Ill. Jun. 27, 2005)
Case details for

U.S. v. McKenzie

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. PATRICK McKENZIE, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division

Date published: Jun 27, 2005

Citations

No. 05 C 362 (N.D. Ill. Jun. 27, 2005)