From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Corona-Rodriguez

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Feb 7, 2007
216 F. App'x 432 (5th Cir. 2007)

Opinion

No. 06-50500 Conference Calendar.

February 7, 2007.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney's Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Henry Joseph Bemporad, Federal Public Defender's Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, USDC No. 5.-05-CR-732-1.

Before REAVLEY, JOLLY, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.


Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Miguel Corona-Rodriguez raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government's motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Corona-Rodriguez

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Feb 7, 2007
216 F. App'x 432 (5th Cir. 2007)
Case details for

U.S. v. Corona-Rodriguez

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Miguel CORONA-RODRIGUEZ…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Feb 7, 2007

Citations

216 F. App'x 432 (5th Cir. 2007)