From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Carson

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division
Mar 8, 2007
3:05CR294 (W.D.N.C. Mar. 8, 2007)

Summary

In Duncan v. Carson, 127 Va. 306, 103 S.E. 665, 105 S.E. 62, and in Watson v. Coles, 170 Va. 141, 195 S.E. 506, this court held that the credibility of a witness, when made an issue, is a question for the jury.

Summary of this case from Ryan v. Maryland Casualty Co.

Opinion

3:05CR294.

March 8, 2007


ORDER


THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on its own motion. By Order filed on November 29, 2006, defendant Duncan Carson self-reported for his psychiatric evaluation.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendant is allowed to self-release pursuant to the bond entered on November 2, 2006 [doc. 92].


Summaries of

U.S. v. Carson

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division
Mar 8, 2007
3:05CR294 (W.D.N.C. Mar. 8, 2007)

In Duncan v. Carson, 127 Va. 306, 103 S.E. 665, 105 S.E. 62, and in Watson v. Coles, 170 Va. 141, 195 S.E. 506, this court held that the credibility of a witness, when made an issue, is a question for the jury.

Summary of this case from Ryan v. Maryland Casualty Co.
Case details for

U.S. v. Carson

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DUNCAN CARSON (7) Defendant

Court:United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division

Date published: Mar 8, 2007

Citations

3:05CR294 (W.D.N.C. Mar. 8, 2007)

Citing Cases

Grace Securities v. Roberts

" See, also, Duncan v. Carson, 127 Va. 306, 103 S.E. 665, 105 S.E. 62; Kennerly v. Columbia Chemical…

McGarry v. Securities and Exchange Commission

An ad testificandum clause is not essential to the validity of such a subpoena, and, where it is included in…