From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Ameline

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Mar 11, 2005
401 F.3d 1007 (9th Cir. 2005)

Opinion

No. 02-30326.

March 11, 2005.

Lori Harper Suek, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Great Falls, MT, Michael Rotker, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Steven F. Hubachek, Esq., Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

David M. Porter, Esq., Federal Public Defender's Office, Sacramento, CA, Anthony R. Gallagher, Esq., Federal Defenders of Montana, Great Falls, MT, for Amicus.


ORDER


Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Ameline

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Mar 11, 2005
401 F.3d 1007 (9th Cir. 2005)
Case details for

U.S. v. Ameline

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF America, Plaintiff — Appellee, v. Alfred Arnold AMELINE…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Mar 11, 2005

Citations

401 F.3d 1007 (9th Cir. 2005)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Rodriguez

The eleven circuits in this count include the Ninth, although its Booker plain error decision has been…

U.S. v. Webb

Section 3553(a) indicates that "in addition to the advisory [G]uideline range, a sentencing court must…