From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Wallace

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Apr 20, 1966
361 F.2d 494 (6th Cir. 1966)

Summary

In United States v. Wallace, 361 F.2d 494 (6th Cir. 1966), four years before Bishop, the same court summarily affirmed a conviction for the theft and transportation of a reconstituted auto whose major parts were stolen. Appellant Wallace's counsel did not appear for argument.

Summary of this case from United States v. Neville

Opinion

No. 16572.

April 20, 1966.

Before O'SULLIVAN, PHILLIPS and EDWARDS, Circuit Judges.


ORDER.

This cause came on to be heard upon the record and briefs, and upon the argument of counsel for appellee, appellant's counsel not appearing, and upon due consideration thereof,

It is ordered that the judgment of the District Court ( 254 F. Supp. 653) be, and it is, hereby affirmed.


Summaries of

United States v. Wallace

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Apr 20, 1966
361 F.2d 494 (6th Cir. 1966)

In United States v. Wallace, 361 F.2d 494 (6th Cir. 1966), four years before Bishop, the same court summarily affirmed a conviction for the theft and transportation of a reconstituted auto whose major parts were stolen. Appellant Wallace's counsel did not appear for argument.

Summary of this case from United States v. Neville
Case details for

United States v. Wallace

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Claude Thomas WALLACE…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Date published: Apr 20, 1966

Citations

361 F.2d 494 (6th Cir. 1966)

Citing Cases

United States v. Neville

I. The defendant's primary challenge is to the court's instruction permitting the jury to convict as to each…