From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Turner

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
Feb 13, 2020
CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 2:19cr134-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Feb. 13, 2020)

Opinion

CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 2:19cr134-MHT (WO)

02-13-2020

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BOBBY TURNER


OPINION AND ORDER

This case is before the court on defendant Bobby Turner's third motion to continue the trial date. For the reasons set forth below, the court finds that Turner's upcoming jury trial, now set for February 24, 2020, should be continued pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h).

While the granting of a continuance is left to the sound discretion of the trial judge, see United States v. Stitzer, 785 F.2d 1506, 1516 (11th Cir. 1986), the court is limited by the requirements of the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161. The Act provides in part:

"In any case in which a plea of not guilty is entered, the trial of a defendant charged in an information or indictment with the commission of an offense shall commence within seventy days from the filing date (and making
public) of the information or indictment, or from the date the defendant has appeared before a judicial officer of the court in which such charge is pending, whichever date last occurs."
§ 3161(c)(1). The Act excludes from the 70-day period any continuance based on "findings that the ends of justice served by taking such action outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial." § 3161(h)(7)(A). In granting such a continuance, the court may consider, among other factors, whether the failure to grant the continuance "would deny counsel for the defendant or the attorney for the Government the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence." § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv).

The court concludes that, in this case, the ends of justice served by granting a continuance outweigh the interest of the public and Turner in a speedy trial. Defense counsel represents that she needs additional time for investigation in preparation for trial and is also in the process of arranging to retain a medicinal marijuana expert. There is no indication of a lack of diligence on defense counsel's part. A continuance is warranted to afford defense counsel reasonable time for preparation. Furthermore, the government does not oppose a continuance.

***

Accordingly, it is ORDERED as follows:

(1) The motion to continue trial (doc. no. 64) is granted.

(2) The jury selection and trial for defendant Bobby Turner, now set for February 24, 2020, are reset for April 27, 2020, at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom 2FMJ of the Frank M. Johnson Jr. United States Courthouse Complex, One Church Street, Montgomery, Alabama.

The United States Magistrate Judge shall conduct a pretrial conference in advance of the April 27, 2020, trial term, and shall reset the deadline for entering a change of plea and any other appropriate deadlines.

DONE, this the 13th day of February, 2019.

/s/ Myron H. Thompson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Turner

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
Feb 13, 2020
CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 2:19cr134-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Feb. 13, 2020)
Case details for

United States v. Turner

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BOBBY TURNER

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Feb 13, 2020

Citations

CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 2:19cr134-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Feb. 13, 2020)