United Statesv.Siegal

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISIONFeb 25, 2013
Case No. CR-12-821 WHA (MEJ) (N.D. Cal. Feb. 25, 2013)

Case No. CR-12-821 WHA (MEJ)

02-25-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. EMMA SIEGAL, ET AL. Defendants.

Kevin Barry Assistant United States Attorney MICHAEL HINCKLEY Attorney for Defendant EMMA SIEGAL


MICHAEL HINCKLEY, State Bar No. 161645
803 Hearst Avenue
Berkeley, California 94710
Telephone: (510) 486-0800
Facsimile: (510) 486-0801
Attorneys for Defendant
EMMA N. SIEGAL


STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED]

ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING

Defendant EMMA SIEGAL, by and through her counsel Michael Hinckley and the United States of America, by and through Assistant United States Attorney Kevin Barry, hereby stipulate and agree to continue this matter from February 28, 2013 to March 26, 2013 at 9:30 a.m.

Good cause exists for this request in that Ms. Siegal, who resides on the east coast, is pregnant. Her expected date of delivery was February 21, 2013. As a result she is unable to fly or travel to Court on the date scheduled.

The parties also stipulate and agree that excluding the time resulting from this continuance from computation under the Speedy Trial Act is appropriate for effective case preparation, medical necessity, and the interest of justice and outweighs the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

______________


Kevin Barry


Assistant United States Attorney


______________


MICHAEL HINCKLEY


Attorney for Defendant


EMMA SIEGAL


ORDER

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, upon stipulation of the parties, this matter is continued from February 28, 2013, to March 26, 2013 at 9:30 a.m.

Also, based upon the representation of counsel and the stipulation, and good cause shown, the Court finds that failure to exclude time from February 28, 2013 to March 26, 2013, would unreasonably deny defendant reasonable time necessary for effective preparation of her counsel, taking into account the exercise of due diligence as well as medical necessity. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv). The Court finds that the ends of justice served by excluding time from February 28, 2013 to March 26, 2013, from computation under the Speedy Trial act outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the time from February 28, 2013 to March 26, 2013, shall be excluded from computation under the Speedy Trial act. 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (h)(7)(A) &(B)(iv).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________


Honorable Maria-Elena James


United States Chief Magistrate Judge