From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Schwartz

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Aug 14, 2017
No. 17-30015 (9th Cir. Aug. 14, 2017)

Opinion

No. 17-30015

08-14-2017

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JUDD JAMES SCHWARTZ, Defendant-Appellant.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION

D.C. No. 2:09-cr-00024-DWM MEMORANDUM Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana
Donald W. Molloy, District Judge, Presiding Before: SCHROEDER, TASHIMA, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Judd James Schwartz appeals from the revocation of supervised release and the 10-month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Schwartz's counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Schwartz the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

United States v. Schwartz

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Aug 14, 2017
No. 17-30015 (9th Cir. Aug. 14, 2017)
Case details for

United States v. Schwartz

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JUDD JAMES SCHWARTZ…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Aug 14, 2017

Citations

No. 17-30015 (9th Cir. Aug. 14, 2017)