From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Rodriguez-Garcia

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
May 24, 2017
No. 16-41361 (5th Cir. May. 24, 2017)

Opinion

No. 16-41361

05-24-2017

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. MARCO VINICIO RODRIGUEZ-GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant


Summary Calendar Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 7:16-CR-508-1 Before DAVIS, SOUTHWICK, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. --------

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Marco Vinicio Rodriguez-Garcia has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Rodriguez-Garcia has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.


Summaries of

United States v. Rodriguez-Garcia

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
May 24, 2017
No. 16-41361 (5th Cir. May. 24, 2017)
Case details for

United States v. Rodriguez-Garcia

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. MARCO VINICIO…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

Date published: May 24, 2017

Citations

No. 16-41361 (5th Cir. May. 24, 2017)