United Statesv.Rau

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ROME DIVISIONDec 2, 2019
Case No. 4:18-cr-00003 (N.D. Ga. Dec. 2, 2019)

Case No. 4:18-cr-00003

12-02-2019

United States of America, v. Cheri Lea Rau (3), Defendant.


ORDER

The Magistrate Judge issued his Report and Recommendation ("R&R"), recommending denial of Defendant Cheri Lea Rau's Motion to Suppress Wiretap Evidence. (Dkts. 742; 775.) Defendant did not file objections.

After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings and recommendations, a district judge may accept, reject, or modify a magistrate judge's report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); FED. R. CRIM. P. 59; Williams v. Wainwright, 681 F.2d 732, 732 (11th Cir. 1982) (per curiam). For those findings and recommendations to which a party has not asserted objections, a court must conduct a plain error review of the record. United States v. Slay, 714 F.2d 1093, 1095 (11th Cir. 1983).

Defendant Rau adopted her motion to suppress from a motion Defendant Bourassa previously filed. (Dkt. 529.) The Magistrate Judge issued an R&R recommending Defendant Bourassa's motion be denied — a recommendation this Court adopted. (Dkts. 772; 827.) The Magistrate Judge recommends that "[s]ince the Non-Final Report and Recommendation in defendant Bourassa's case controls the outcome" here, this motion should be denied. (Dkt. 775 at 1.) The Court finds no error in this recommendation and denies Defendant Rau's motion to suppress.

The Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 775) and DENIES Defendant Cheri Lea Rau's Motion to Suppress Wiretap Evidence (Dkt. 742).

SO ORDERED this 2nd day of December, 2019.

/s/_________

MICHAEL L. BROWN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE