From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Preston

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Aug 14, 2013
727 F.3d 894 (9th Cir. 2013)

Opinion

No. 11–10511.

2013-08-14

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Tymond J. PRESTON, Defendant–Appellant.

Michael Thomas Morrissey, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Phoenix, AZ, for Plaintiff–Appellee. Keith Swisher, Phoenix School of Law, Phoenix, AZ, for Defendant–Appellant.


Michael Thomas Morrissey, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Phoenix, AZ, for Plaintiff–Appellee. Keith Swisher, Phoenix School of Law, Phoenix, AZ, for Defendant–Appellant.
D.C. No. 3:10–cr–08026–GMS–1.

ORDER


KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35–3. The three judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Judge MURGUIA did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.


Summaries of

United States v. Preston

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Aug 14, 2013
727 F.3d 894 (9th Cir. 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Preston

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. TYMOND J. PRESTON…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Aug 14, 2013

Citations

727 F.3d 894 (9th Cir. 2013)

Citing Cases

United States v. Rodriguez

While this appeal was pending, we voted to take the Preston case en banc and ordered that the three-judge…

United States v. Preston

A majority of the active judges on the court voted to rehear the case en banc. United States v. Preston, 727…