From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Perez

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Apr 9, 2018
No. 17-11097 (5th Cir. Apr. 9, 2018)

Opinion

No. 17-11097

04-09-2018

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. MARIO ROBLES PEREZ, Defendant-Appellant


Summary Calendar Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 6:17-CR-15-1 Before KING, ELROD, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. --------

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Mario Robles Perez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Perez has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Perez's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claim without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).

We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Perez's response. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.


Summaries of

United States v. Perez

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Apr 9, 2018
No. 17-11097 (5th Cir. Apr. 9, 2018)
Case details for

United States v. Perez

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. MARIO ROBLES PEREZ…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Apr 9, 2018

Citations

No. 17-11097 (5th Cir. Apr. 9, 2018)