United Statesv.Parks

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINAJan 17, 2012
CR No.: 3:10-112-JFA (D.S.C. Jan. 17, 2012)

CR No.: 3:10-112-JFA

01-17-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. PATRICK PARKS


ORDER

Upon motion of the defendant under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) for a reduction in the term of imprisonment imposed based on a guideline sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered and made retroactive by the United States Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 994(u), and having considered such motion, and taking into account the policy statement set forth at USSG § 1B1.10 and the sentencing factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), to the extent that they are applicable,

IT IS ORDERED that the motion (ECF No. 82) is DENIED. The defendant's guideline range was based upon his being found to be a Career Offender. Therefore, defendant's Guidelines sentencing range, adopted by this court at sentencing, is unaffected by Amendment 750.

IT IS SO ORDERED. January 17, 2012
Columbia, South Carolina


_____________


Joseph F. Anderson, Jr.


United States District Judge