United Statesv.Odman

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUITDec 27, 2012
No. 12-7500 (4th Cir. 2012)
No. 12-7500502 Fed. Appx. 259

No. 12-7500

12-27-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. OWEN ODMAN, a/k/a Star, Defendant - Appellant.

Owen Odman, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Lee Edwards, Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorneys, Jill Westmoreland Rose, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina; Adam Christopher Morris, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Shelby. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (4:96-cr-00053-MR-1) Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Owen Odman, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Lee Edwards, Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorneys, Jill Westmoreland Rose, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina; Adam Christopher Morris, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Owen Odman appeals the district court's order granting his motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Odman, No. 4:96-cr-00053-MR-1 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 13, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Although the district court granted Odman's § 3582 motion, the reduction granted by the court did not reduce Odman's sentence to the full extent he requested.

AFFIRMED