United States
v.
Noble

This case is not covered by Casetext's citator
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUITNov 7, 2018
No. 18-6768 (4th Cir. Nov. 7, 2018)

No. 18-6768

11-07-2018

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. TYRONE NOBLE, Defendant - Appellant.

Tyrone Noble, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (3:06-cr-00748-JFA-9) Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tyrone Noble, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Tyrone Noble appeals the district court's order construing his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion as an unauthorized successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion and dismissing for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability (COA) as unnecessary and affirm. See United States v. McRae, 793 F.3d 392, 400 (4th Cir. 2015) ("[W]e need not issue a COA before determining whether the district court erred in dismissing [a] purported Rule 60(b) motion as an unauthorized successive habeas petition."). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED