United Statesv.NGOC Duong

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISIONAug 28, 2012
CR No. 12-0578 SI (N.D. Cal. Aug. 28, 2012)

CR No. 12-0578 SI

08-28-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. NGOC DUONG, a/k/a Danny Duong, and HONG LEE WONG, a/k/a William Wong, Defendants.

MELINDA HAAG United States Attorney DENISE MARIE BARTON Assistant United States Attorney CLAIRE LEARY Attorney for NGOC DUONG DANIEL P. BLANK Attorney for HONG LEE WONG


MELINDA HAAG (CABN 132612)


United States Attorney


MIRANDA KANE (CABN 150630)


Criminal Chief


DENISE MARIE BARTON (MABN 634052)


Assistant United States Attorney


STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER EXCLUDING TIME UNDER

THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT FROM

AUGUST 24, 2012 THROUGH

NOVEMBER 2, 2012

At the August 24, 2012 appearance before this Court, the parties advised the Court that the Government had produced some discovery and would be producing additional discovery. The parties further advised that counsel required time to review discovery. All parties agreed that time was properly excluded from August 24, 2012 through November 2, 2012 for effective preparation of counsel. For all these reasons, the parties agree and request that the Court enter an Order that time is properly excluded from August 24, 2012 through November 2, 2012 under the Speedy Trial Clock based on effective preparation of counsel. See 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), (B)(iv). IT IS SO STIPULATED:

MELINDA HAAG


United States Attorney


_________________


DENISE MARIE BARTON


Assistant United States Attorney


_________________


CLAIRE LEARY


Attorney for NGOC DUONG


_________________


DANIEL P. BLANK


Attorney for HONG LEE WONG


[PROPOSED] ORDER

Based upon the representation of counsel and for good cause shown, the Court finds that failing to exclude the time from August 24, 2012 through November 2, 2012 would unreasonably deny counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation of counsel, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. See 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv). The Court further finds that the ends of justice served by excluding the time from August 24, 2012 through November 2, 2012 from computation under the Speedy Trial Act outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the time from August 24, 2012 through November 2, 2012 shall be excluded from computation under the Speedy Trial Act. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), (B)(iv).

_________________


THE HON. SUSAN ILLSTON


United States District Judge