From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Mendoza

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
Jan 6, 2012
No. CR 10-00822-DLJ (N.D. Cal. Jan. 6, 2012)

Opinion

No. CR 10-00822-DLJ

01-06-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JORGE MENDOZA, et al. Defendants.

MELINDA HAAG United States Attorney Thomas A. Colthurst Assistant United States Attorney Robert W. Lyons, Esq. Counsel for Defendant Jorge Mendoza Curtis V. Rodriguez, Esq. Counsel for Defendant Alejandro Gonzales


MELINDA HAAG (CABN 132612)

United States Attorney

MIRANDA KANE (CABN 150630)

Criminal Chief, Criminal Division

THOMAS A. COLTHURST (CABN 99493)

Assistant United States Attorney

Attorneys for United States of America

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXCLUDING TIME FROM JANUARY 12, 2012 TO FEBRUARY 9, 2012

On the Court's motion, the next status hearing in this matter was moved from January 12, 2011, at 9:00 a.m., to February 9, 2011, at 9:00 a.m. The defendant Jorge Mendoza, represented by Robert W. Lyons, Esq., the defendant Alejandro Gonzales, represented by Curtis V. Rodriguez, Esq., and the government, represented by Thomas A. Colthurst, Assistant United States Attorney, request that time be excluded under the Speedy Trial Act from January 12, 2011 to February 9, 2011, to permit the parties the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation.

MELINDA HAAG

United States Attorney

________________

Thomas A. Colthurst

Assistant United States Attorney

________________

Robert W. Lyons, Esq.

Counsel for Defendant Jorge Mendoza

________________

Curtis V. Rodriguez, Esq.

Counsel for Defendant Alejandro Gonzales

ORDER

Based upon the stipulation of the parties, and for good cause shown, the Court finds that failing to exclude the time between January 12, 2011 and February 9, 2011, would deny counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv). The Court further finds that the ends of justice served by excluding the time between January 12, 2011 and February 9, 2011, from computation under the Speedy Trial Act outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that the time between January 12, 2011 and February 9, 2011, shall be excluded from computation under the Speedy Trial Act. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv). IT IS SO ORDERED.

________________

THE HONORABLE D. LOWELL JENSEN

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Mendoza

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
Jan 6, 2012
No. CR 10-00822-DLJ (N.D. Cal. Jan. 6, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Mendoza

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JORGE MENDOZA, et al. Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Date published: Jan 6, 2012

Citations

No. CR 10-00822-DLJ (N.D. Cal. Jan. 6, 2012)