United States
v.
Mangum

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth CircuitSep 10, 2018
No. 18-1404 (8th Cir. Sep. 10, 2018)

No. 18-1404

09-10-2018

United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Gabriel Mangum Defendant - Appellant


Appeal from United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa - Cedar Rapids [Unpublished] Before BENTON, SHEPHERD, and STRAS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM.

Gabriel Mangum appeals the Guidelines-range sentence the district court imposed after he pled guilty to an escape charge. Mangum's counsel has moved to withdraw and submitted a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), arguing that the sentence was substantively unreasonable. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms.

The Honorable Linda R. Reade, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Iowa. --------

After careful review of the record, this court concludes that the district court did not impose an unreasonable sentence, as there was no indication that it overlooked a relevant 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factor, or committed a clear error of judgment in weighing relevant factors. See United States v. David, 682 F.3d 1074, 1077 (8th Cir. 2012) (standard of review); United States v. Wohlman, 651 F.3d 878, 887 (8th Cir. 2011). The sentence was within the Guidelines range. See United States v. Callaway, 762 F.3d 754, 760 (8th Cir. 2014). This court has independently reviewed the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), and finds no nonfrivolous issues for appeal.

The judgment is affirmed. Counsel's motion to withdraw is granted.