United States
v.
Leitaker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIAAug 2, 2012
Case No. 2:12-cr-00094-MCE (E.D. Cal. Aug. 2, 2012)

Case No. 2:12-cr-00094-MCE

08-02-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JOHN DANIEL LEITAKER Defendant.

MARK J. REICHEL, Bar #155034 REICHEL & PLESSER L.L.P. Attorneys At Law Attorney for Defendant JOHN DANIEL LEITAKER


MARK J. REICHEL, Bar #155034


REICHEL & PLESSER L.L.P.


Attorneys At Law


Attorney for Defendant


JOHN DANIEL LEITAKER


STIPULATION TO SET BRIEFING

SCHEDULE; ORDER THEREON


Date: September 13, 2012

Judge: Hon. Morrison C. England, Jr.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel, MATTHEW G. MORRIS, Assistant United States Attorney, attorney for Plaintiff, and MARK J. REICHEL, Esq., attorney for defendant LEITAKER, that the status conference previously scheduled for August 2, 2012 shall be vacated.

The parties agree to set a briefing schedule for the filing of dispositive pre trial motions.

Defense Filing: August 16, 2012

Government Opposition: August 30, 2012

Defense Replies: September 6, 2012

Hearing on the Motions: September 13, 2012

At the hearing on the 13th, if the motions are denied, the hearing will be a trial setting date, and/or the setting of the date for a change of plea.

Accordingly, all counsel and defendant agree that time under the Speedy Trial Act from the date of lodging of the stipulation through September 13, 2012 should be excluded in computing the time within which trial must commence under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to Title 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (H)(7)(B)(iv) and Local Code T4, and that the ends of justice to be served by granting a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Respectfully submitted,

MARK J. REICHEL, ESQ.

_______________


MARK J. REICHEL


Attorney for defendant


BENJAMIN WAGNER


United States Attorney


MARK J. REICHEL
for:


MATTHEW G. MORRIS


Assistant U.S. Attorney


Attorney for Plaintiff


ORDER

In accordance with the foregoing stipulation, time is excluded in the interests of justice pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § (H)(7)(B)(iv) and Local Code T4, and the Court finds that the ends of justice to be served by granting a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

The August 2, 2012 status conference in this matter is accordingly vacated and the briefing schedule for filing dispositive pretrial motions is adopted as set forth above. The hearing on those motions shall be September 13, 2012 at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom No. 7.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_______________________


MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR.


UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE